Phonological and Phonemic Awareness:
Phonological awareness (paired with alphabet knowledge) are the two most powerful predictors of early literacy achievement, according to the National Early Literacy Panel and the Barone and Mallet text. Activities that focus on phonological and phonemic awareness deal only with letter sounds and sounds that make up words, in other words, these are auditory activities. These awareness skills must be explicitly taught because most students will not learn phonological awareness on their own. The instruction needs to focus on the different parts of oral language, starting with the larger units such as words or syllables, and then moving to rhymes and beginning sounds, and then finally individual phonemes within words. Phonemes are the hardest sounds to isolate, and the difficulty can change depending on the speaker and pace of speech.
Using pictures and encouraging the use of oral language in a game-like format can be a good activity to teach phonological awareness. This can also be a way to informally assess a student's knowledge.
Alphabet and Alphabetic Principle:
Knowledge of the alphabet and the alphabetic principle are important stepping stones in order for students to begin to decode words. Similar to phonological awareness, the alphabet needs to be taught explicitly in order for students to gain this important knowledge. Most alphabet instruction begins with learning the alphabet song, but it is important that students are exposed to the visual component of letters as well in order to separate the individual letters and not blend them. Letters in a child's name are usually a good starting place for talking about letters and letter sounds. The letters that give a clue to their sound (such as the letter b), are usually easier of children to learn. Children usually learn their upper-case letters first and then make connections when learning the lower-case letters. The writing of these upper-case letters (and some words, such as their name) is an opportunity for students to connect and use their knowledge of phonological awareness as well as the alphabet. Often, these words may be spelled using phonetic writing (or invented spelling). Children may use their partial phonemic awareness to spell words (such as using the first letter correctly).
Instruction needs to include opportunities for children to write about various topics and use invented spelling. This can be an informal way for teachers to know if students are understanding the alphabetic principle and if they are starting to build a foundation for phonological awareness. Teachers can also play games with students where students are asked to match pictures with the same sound or rhyme or produce a certain letter-sound.
Both of the chapters did not cover either of these concepts in detail. I look forward to reading about your experiences reading about these topics in the articles!
Concepts of Print:
These are important concepts to know before being able to read independently. These need to be covered and instructed each time a text is read aloud in the classroom. Informal assessments can occur during small group and independent reading time.
Word Recognition and Decoding:
The word recognition and decoding is a skill that will build over time. Learning letter sounds and exposure to language are vital to being able to decode and recognize words. We need to expose our students to words and books, and teach them techniques to figure out words during read-alouds.
_____________________
I loved the "Insights from Ms. Gimm" on p. 171 (Barone and Mallette). I want to highlight her guidelines for effective and engaging instruction in an early literacy classroom.
- She designs fun, engaging, and motivating instruction.
- Drills are not fun. Making learning into a game helps students have fun while learning these important concepts.
- She fosters word consciousness and interest in words and language.
- Silly songs and playing with letters helps students to engage with the language.
- She embeds instruction in a literacy context.
- Read-aloud's, big books, and songs can all be helpful during literacy learning. Helping students make connections between oral and written language is important.
- She scaffolds instruction to gradually release support.
- Explanation by the teacher, recognition, identification, and then production by the student -- she makes sure the children understand the concept before moving on to the next step.
Some students may need support than others. Teachers may need to modify task difficulty or change the task completely depending on the student. Asking a child to blend or segment a word is an easier task than having to sort and compare words. Along the same lines, choosing a specific letter out of a choice of 3 is easier than having to provide a letter name to a random letter of the alphabet. Instruction and assessment needs to be designed with all students' needs in mind.
_____________________
Oral Language vs Written Language
I learned a lot from reading Kucer Chapter 3. Writing is not just spoken language that is printed, as I have originally believed. It is much more complex than oral language. It also serves different purposes. Oral language comes and goes, and only lasts in memory (unless recorded), although it can be repeated if requested by the listener and granted by the speaker. Written language, on the other hand is usually more planned and has the potential to be read and remembered forever. Written language is usually more dense and detailed than oral language.
Oral and written language do have components in common. Both forms of language are usually changed based upon the audience. You would usually write or speak to a friend in a different way than you would write or speak to your boss or an authority figure. Technology has certainly blurred the lines between the languages. Oral language can now be recorded and played over and over again, through the use of a phone, computer, or camera technology. Oral language can also be heard any where in the world if the language is through a tv or internet medium. These two features make oral language more similar to written language. The two language forms also have a tendency to overlap. I liked the comparison to thinking of a speech. If you or I was giving a presentation, many of us would probably have note cards or jotted down thoughts that we want to touch on. We might have even written a whole speech to recite.
English Spelling
This chapter clearly demonstrated (to me) the difficulties that arise for someone learning the English language. We have words that sound alike, but have different meanings (homophones), like to, two, too. We also have words that are spelled the same, sometimes pronounced the same, but have different meanings (homograph), like bow and bow. And for the last category, there are words in our English language that sound the same, are spelled the same, but have different meanings (homonym). These are still difficult for me to keep straight! Our language is alphabetic, which means our letters relate to the sounds in words. But these sounds can change based upon their position in the word and the other letters surrounding the letter. This is especially true in the case of vowel sounds, while consonant sounds are usually more consistent. When listening to a conversation in English, special attention needs to be paid to context in order to decipher meaning. When reading, one can pay attention to spelling as well in order to determine meaning. One of the great things about reading written text is that dialect does not matter, because spelling is the same for all dialects of English.
QUESTIONS!!!
1. Do you believe that technology has made it more difficult to separate the differences between oral and written language (and what is appropriate for each)? Do you think this positively or negatively impacts the classroom?
2. Are there any strategies that you remember being helpful to you learning your letters or sounds? Or if you are an early literacy teacher, what are some strategies you find effective?
3. What do you think is the best way to go about teaching homophones, homographs, and homonyms? This seems like a difficult task because of the similarity between the words.
4. What is your top (or couple top) take-aways from the chapters?
Thank you ladies!! I look forward to reading and responding to you this week.
1. I have a love/hate relationship with technology. I do think that technology has blurred the lines between oral and written language. Technology has changed the physical context of written language by making immediate (chatting online; texting) and more personal. Now through blogging and skype no longer is written language composed for a long-distance audience. Oral communication can now be saved over space and time, as well as be permanent thanks to audio files, podcasts, and videos. Processing demands on oral language have also changed because of technology. Listeners of oral language can now replay oral discourse, and don't have to commit things to memory. The processing demands of written language have stayed similar in the face of technology. Both of these types of language are both more permanent and immediate.
ReplyDeletePositives: I think technology opens a whole new word to how students can access language and produce language. Students can hear interviews from political figures, participate in distance learning, and quickly communicate with each other.
Negative: Students start to believe that all writing should be spontaneous and instantaneous, and available at the snap of your fingers. Being accustomed to so much technology and instant communication, also manifests itself in texting language in academic writing. Another negative I have noticed in myself is not wanting to have face-to-face or telephone oral conversations with people. We'd rather text or email someone.
2. I remember Chicka-Chicka-Boom-Boom and other rhymes (I before E, except after C) that helped me learn how to read and spell. I still say some of these things to myself when writing and typing. I remember having a letter of the week in kindergarten that had a song and a blow-up character that represented the letter. Though I don't teach in an early childhood classroom, some activities I remember from undergrad are using anything tactile or kinesthetic as a means of teaching letters. Using shaving cream, sandpaper, dry erase boards, arms and legs to create letters are all fun ways to practice writing graphemes.
3. Homophones, Homographs, Homonyms: With older kiddos to differentiate between the terms, I like to use Greek and Latin roots. I discuss that homo means same. Then we talk about phone meaning sound, graph meaning writing, and nym meaning name. When teaching about example of each one, I like to use visuals. I like to pass out a set of homophones or homographs to students, and have them illustrate all the different meanings/spellings. These illustrations can be shared with the class and put into a classbook. I also try to do one spelling list a year that has homonyms in it to really focus on and raw attention to these words.
4. Kucer Takeaway: I loved reading about the history of spelling. I think it is fascinating that English language is as much of a melting pot of languages as the USA is a melting pot of cultures. Reading about the history of spelling and the generalizations (and exceptions to generalizations) reminds how amazing it is that kids grow up to learn to write, spell, and speak in English with a high degree of accuracy. It reminds me how hard learning our language must be for ELLs and how overwhelmed they must feel every single day trying to remember when to apply the rule, not apply the rule, add a silent e, drop the silent e, etc.
B&M Takeaway: I liked B&M's ladder analogy for development of phonological awareness and alphabetic knowledge. Though there are definite "rungs" or stages of development they are not rigid. Since my background is not in early childhood, I appreciated the breakdown in Figure 9.1 for phonological awareness and pg. 160 in for alphabet knowledge.
Hi Jenny! Thanks for your input. I love your idea of a class book for homophones, homographs, or homonyms. It seems that allowing students to create illustrations would be helpful to help distinguish meanings. Also making a book would mean that it could become a classroom resource to look back on! I love it!
DeleteI completely agree with your Kucer takeaway. English is so difficult! All the different rules (and exceptions to those rules!) make it a challenging task to learn, especially for students learning a second language.
Jenny! I really liked the way you explained the homophones, homographs, or homonyms. I think I was still a little confused, so your explanation was helpful for me!
DeleteI also agree with your thoughts on technology. It can be difficult for students to navigate when (and why) they need to use academic language and when using more informal language is appropriate. Especially now that kids are getting into technology at younger ages!
I liked the ladder too and drew a picture of it in my notebook. Pictures seem to help clarify certain ideas, don't they?
DeleteI am a visual learner all the way!
Delete1. I don't think technology should be looked at as positive or negative, I think it should be views as different. There are so many good things that have come from technology that at times I think they over shadow any negatives. I think technology written language is basically oral language written down. People type like they speak: blogs, text, social media etc. Therefore I do believe it is difficult to separate them. I don't know how I feel about this impacting the classroom. I tend to be indifferent because obviously technology isn't going anywhere, therefor having negative thoughts towards this won't help anything. I tend to take the side of embrace the change and get excited! One thing I always say is that technology has it's own literacy. Students not only have to learn english mechanics, but technology print and symbols. This puts a lot of pressure on kids.
ReplyDelete2. When I teach the alphabet I like to use lots of movement and songs. This helps students remember the letters sounds. I also used a letter journal. The students would write the letter and then get a dictionary to copy a word or draw a picture for the letter of the week. Then they could reference their journals. Students were also given mobile word walls to help them with their writings that they kept at their desk.
3. Since I taught pre-k and kindergarten I didn't get to much into these. I like the ideas that Jenny mentioned like the illustrations and using visuals! I need to look more into this!
4. I really like the word study article. I used this method a lot and had no idea it was researched based! Kind of exciting when you see things you already do and back it up with research!
Kaitlin, you brought up some great points about technology that I had not thought of. I agree that writing in regards to technology is more like speech written down. Technology is a different literacy that has different rules, symbols, and types of composition.
DeleteKaitlin, your thoughts on technology are very telling about who you are as a teacher, and I think you are absolutely right.
DeleteI really like your ideas for letters, could you explain more about your mobile word walls?
I have a love-hate relationship with technology too and I laughed when I read that. Kaitlin's points were helpful to turning me around to be a bit more positive about it.
DeleteMobile word wall is a printed out table with lines that have the alphabet printed out and under each letter there is room for words. Then a center for the kids would be once a month write down all the words that you do not have in your mobile word wall. Then the actual word wall could change and they still have access to the older words! Below is a link to a similar one that doesn't have to have printed sheets. She used stickers! I like that too. That way the kids put it together and have more ownership!
Deletehttp://subhubonline.blogspot.com/2012/03/personal-word-walls.html
Kaitlin, Thank you for your explanation of mobile word walls! What a wonderful activity to allow students to have constant access to words that have been learned and reviewed during the year. I would also imagine it is helpful to students during their reading and writing time!
DeleteThanks Kaitlin for the mobile word wall. Could you write that up for me to include in the iBook?
DeleteCourtney, you did a superb job on our blog this week! I'm thoroughly impressed, as I am with all of the posts. It was a lot to take in.
ReplyDelete1. My immediate thought about technology is that it's overused, but I'm not so sure I'm right about that. I'm just old. I agreed with Kaitlin's ideas that technology is here to stay, and it has its own language. Good point. I think it depends how technology is used. I'm fearful that students will assume all writing is casual, abbreviated, and chatty because of their interactions with technology. There's something to be said for formality, I think. If a child's initial introduction to written language is texting, for instance, will the child assume all writing is this easy? I don't know. I have ambivalent feelings about technology. Yes, it offers a lot, but I also think it takes away a personal touch, personal interaction, face-to-face interaction. Do we all want to be communicating through machines? Ugh! Help!
2. I've heard it said that if you don't remember how you learned to read, then the teaching was effective. I don't know if that's true. I vaguely recall learning phonics in the early 1960's, and I read Dick and Jane primers, and I was in the blue reading group. I also remember telling my younger sister that I could read when I was 4 years old, and I remember "reading" that young. Beyond that, I don't remember much. (I am old!)
I've taught phonics and whole language, basically simultaneously. In my opinion and experience, phonics should be taught to all students, but needs to be retaught to students who need remediation. I've seen some very boring phonics lessons taught to entire classes of young children --- children who were bright and caught on quickly --- usually because higher-ups in administration misunderstood what phonics is intended to do for children's reading efforts. Having said that, I use a phonics-based approach with my language-based students because they haven't caught on to or mastered the alphabetic principle, nor have they developed phonemic awareness. Young children love to sing, and the alphabet song certainly is fun to sing. There are many songs to help teach phonemic awareness, which I think is effective, too.
3. This is a great question. I teach homonyms/homographs/homophones to my second- and third-grade students, but I haven't hit on any one idea that brings the idea home. I really like Jenny's idea of creating a class book with illustrations.
4. My take away from Kucer is that the relationship between letters and sounds is not based solely on the alphabetic principle, but also includes meaning. Meaning is vital to fully comprehending written text. I also loved the history of spelling. The most interesting thing I learned from that is that punctuation was created to help organize parts of a sentence, that years ago the reader put punctuation into the written word as it was being read.
My take away from B&M was task difficulty modification. I appreciated how they broke down modifying teasks from easiest to most difficult, beginning with matching and sorting sounds, to blending phonemes and segmenting, to adding or substituting sounds, to spelling phonetically and decoding. While I thought I knew this, it was helpful to m to see it in writing.
Thanks for all of your interesting observations and comments, ladies. I enjoy reading what you write (evenif it is on a computer).
I was a whole language product! I definitely think phonics is something that still needs to be taught. I know I would be a better reader, writer, and speller if I'd had more explicit teaching. I do like that you said if you don't remember how you learned to read then your teaching was effective! YAAY Then maybe I learned what I needed!
DeleteI think you brought up a great point about learning letters and sounds. Meaning is vital to all learning! Otherwise it's just symbols. It's a good reminder. Even a good reminder with my 2 year old. I've been hounding letters with him the last couple weeks, I need to remember that memorizing the letters doesn't mean much without meaning! But it's a start!
Marti, I agree with your B&M takeaway. Confession: I am not great about differentiation even though it was pounded into my head in my undergrad program. I think I struggle with it more in upper grades because at that age, kids know when they are doing a different assignment than other kids. I hate hurting their self-esteem. I liked how B&M talked about development, and that we need to differentiate because some kids are developmentally ready for more while some kids aren't. With my kiddos, I try to differentiate tasks with scaffolding more than different activities.
DeleteMarti, thank you for your input! I agree - technology has changed the way many students look at language. This is why teaching formal ways of writing and speaking is so important. Students have to know there is a time and a purpose for different types of language.
DeleteMarti, I think that your concerns about technology are justified. It is a complex thing, this teaching of writing. Students today are used to having everything at their fingertips, but we need to teach them how to adjust their writing for different contexts.
DeleteI also agree about the meaning in spelling. It is an important thing to emphasize: after all, the main point of language is that it has meaning. So, it makes sense that the meaning even goes to such a small part as spelling.
There are a ton of cute homophone, homograph, homonym videos on youtube for all ages. Here a few cute ones for primary grades:
ReplyDelete- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJUqJyX5NSA&index=3&list=PL0FADEDE58C214DBB
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3prL9EHifw0 (Listening Between Lions)
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVZ_CYAKeFA
Sorry for the weird formatting! I thought these links would copy as hyperlinks. I apologize!
DeleteYay Jenny! Thanks for these!!
DeleteThanks. I'll look them up.
ReplyDelete1. Do you believe that technology has made it more difficult to separate the differences between oral and written language (and what is appropriate for each)? Do you think this positively or negatively impacts the classroom?
ReplyDeleteI think that technology has always impacted language-from the printing press to texting- and I imagine that it will go on influencing it. I think that it has mixed results in the classroom, as technology typically changes before schools have the budgets or the equipment to respond. I think the biggest issues to cover with our students are meaning, context, purpose, audience, and adaptability. Children usually love to use technology, and I think that as educators we should use this to our advantage. However, because so much of their language has always been instant and informal, some students have trouble adjusting to the language of school. Technology does make it more difficult at times: I liked how the chapter discussed the concepts of planned and unplanned language. I believe that as technology changes these might be the categories that language fits into best, rather than oral and written. Language is basically a thinking process; the speed and preparation of how thoughts are presented is the main idea that we need to address with our students, and explain that there are different contexts where more planning is expected.
2. Are there any strategies that you remember being helpful to you learning your letters or sounds? Or if you are an early literacy teacher, what are some strategies you find effective?
I remember singing the Alphabet Song, and I very vividly remember the problem of LMNOP: that was particularly troublesome for me. I also remember Chicka Chicka Boom Boom, and having a new letter every week for kindergarten. The teacher would pull out a popsickle letter out of a brown bag along with small objects that started with that letter. We made the letter shapes with our bodies. And we did little choral response like "C" makes a k sound and sometimes an s sound.
3. What do you think is the best way to go about teaching homophones, homographs, and homonyms? This seems like a difficult task because of the similarity between the words.
I agree, this seems like a difficult task. When I did my student teaching we did a spelling/vocabulary list of these words and this seemed to help. We played games with them. One summer, I worked at a Reading Center as a preschool teacher and tutor, and we would explicitly teach these as they came up in a student's word family list or in their books that they read. I think that having mnemonics such as word play, songs, choral responses and other games would be helpful in this case. I think also that making some sort of a class resource with pictures and examples would be helpful; I really liked Jenny's idea. I think that talking about it and teaching explicitly when these words come up would be beneficial.
4. What is your top (or couple top) take-aways from the chapters?
Kucer Take Away
I liked the history of English spelling, in undergrad I had to take a History of the English Language Course, and this was a nice refresher. English is based on so many different languages, and also influenced by technology. I think that the important thing is to remember that English spelling is based largely on meaning. Students need to have this taught explicitly and engage in word study that helps them to grasp this concept and broaden their vocabulary.
B&M Take Away
I really liked the explanation about phonological awareness and ELL students. I am sure that learning how to spell English can be very difficult, as discussed in Kucer, but being aware of sounds would be an easily transferable skill. However, there are sounds that do not exist in all languages, so this could cause some difficulties. I think that this knowledge would be very helpful for all teachers to be aware of in in order to help our students.
Singing songs and choral responses are great! They really help kids learn! They are catchy and help students memorize. I even think about my son how much more engaged he is if I'm singing and how much he remembers. I also think about commercials for adults and how they captures our attention! I think songs have place in all grades for learning!
DeleteI agree with the ELL, I'd never thought about how other languages don't have certain sounds. Keeping this in mind really humbles me. I realize how difficult it is to learn.
Megan, what kind of games did you play with homophones, homonyms, and homographs? I would LOVE to know them. Thanks for your positive comments about technology. I agree that adaptability is a HUGE part of using technology with children. Students must understand that language varies by context, and students must be exposed to a variety of purposes and audiences.
DeleteJenny, we played SPARKLE. Which is kind of a spelling game that you play in a circle and the first person would come up with a sentence with the homonym, homophone, or homograph and the kids would spell the word, and if you said the wrong letter you would be out. We also found some online poems with them, so we read those together to kind of emphasize the differences.
ReplyDeleteWOW! Great conversation and important takeaways.
ReplyDelete